Associated Press Continues Deceptions -- Economy GROWING??
Here's a copy of e-mails sent to our Worcesterr Telegram and Gazette after they published a front page story of Associated Press deceptions.
Feel Free to send your own thoughts to Leah Lamson, Editor, Worcester Telegram & Gazette.
Len Mead
E-Mail to: Leah Lamson, Editor, Worcester Telegram & Gazette
CC: Andi Esposito, Managing Editor, Local News
Chris Sinacola, Editor, Editorial Pages
2-4-12
Dear Editor Lamson,
Your decision today to run the Associated Press release, “Jobs, stocks, buying up - Telegram Economy shows twitches of life” as your LEAD STORY is horrible journalism and deserves a retraction.
Yes, it’s a release from the “Associated Press” (known otherwise by conservatives as the “state run media”) but professional journalism still requires you to actually question and fact check these deceptive, misleading stories before feeding them as truthful to your readers.
It doesn’t take an economics degree from Harvard to understand what’s really happening to our precious economy under the Obama regime. You can do the same fact-checking that any of your readers can do – such as researching the links and data below. These sources easily lead one to the following truthful conclusions:
· Our precious economy is crashing because there are 2 million fewer jobs than 4 years ago
· Our economy is crashing because after years of failure only 63% of “workers” are even looking for work -- making the “real U6” unemployment rate 15.1%.
· Our Economy will continue to crash towards bankruptcy unless government size and spending is reduced because we cannot continue to spend money that is borrowed.
Below are a few links and a paragraph stolen from the Rush Limbaugh website explaining, so simply, what YOU SHOULD BE REPORTING to your readers.
When good publications like yours spew out unchecked propaganda from the Associated Press, it results in otherwise intelligent readers making poor voting choices which may retain in power the very public figures that are intentionally destroying our country and making it into a nightmare “dream” of European or Russian socialism.
Best,
Len
Len Mead
Unwashed Conservative, Westborough
US Dept of Labor February 2012 Statistics Show LOSS of 2 Million Jobs, Only 63% of “Workers” Even LOOKING For Work! Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey
Series Id: LNS11300000 Seasonally Adjusted Series title: (Seas) Labor Force Participation Rate Labor force status: Civilian labor force participation rate Type of data: Percent or rate Age: 16 years and over |
|
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Annual |
2002 | 66.5 | 66.8 | 66.6 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 66.6 | 66.5 | 66.6 | 66.7 | 66.6 | 66.4 | 66.3 | |
2003 | 66.4 | 66.4 | 66.3 | 66.4 | 66.4 | 66.5 | 66.2 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 65.9 | |
2004 | 66.1 | 66.0 | 66.0 | 65.9 | 66.0 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.0 | 65.8 | 65.9 | 66.0 | 65.9 | |
2005 | 65.8 | 65.9 | 65.9 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.2 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.0 | 66.0 | |
2006 | 66.0 | 66.1 | 66.2 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.2 | 66.1 | 66.2 | 66.1 | 66.2 | 66.3 | 66.4 | |
2007 | 66.4 | 66.3 | 66.2 | 65.9 | 66.0 | 66.0 | 66.0 | 65.8 | 66.0 | 65.8 | 66.0 | 66.0 | |
2008 | 66.2 | 66.0 | 66.1 | 65.9 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 66.1 | 65.9 | 66.0 | 65.8 | 65.8 | |
2009 | 65.7 | 65.8 | 65.6 | 65.6 | 65.7 | 65.7 | 65.5 | 65.4 | 65.1 | 65.0 | 65.0 | 64.6 | |
2010 | 64.8 | 64.9 | 64.9 | 65.1 | 64.9 | 64.6 | 64.6 | 64.7 | 64.6 | 64.4 | 64.5 | 64.3 | |
2011 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.1 | 64.0 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 64.0 | 64.0 | |
2012 | 63.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stolen From Rush Limbaugh Website:
“But what they did is reduce the overall number of jobs possible by 1.2 million. So fewer jobs is gonna bring down the unemployment rate because... If the labor force were what it is, or what it was when Obama was inaugurated 2009, the unemployment rate would be close to 10%. It's only 8.3 because they have used seasonal adjustment to just say that last month, 1.2 million people gone from the workforce. No jobs anymore.
So the Bureau of Labor Statistics looks at the loss of 2.5 million jobs, and they say, "Well, we think 1.2 million have just decided to give up looking for work so we won't count half of them, just to make things more accurate." And even with that major cheat, that still leaves more than a million-and-a-half lost jobs unaccounted for. Fewer people looking for jobs brings down the jobless rate. In this case, not more people finding jobs brings down the jobless rate. Fewer people looking for jobs is what's bringing the unemployment rate down. There isn't job creation going on. Not to the tune the regime wants you to believe it. It just isn't happening.”


By Christopher S. Rugaber THE ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON — In a long-awaited surge of hiring, companies added 243,000 jobs in January — across the economy, up and down the pay scale and far more than just about anyone expected. Unemployment fell to 8.3 percent, the lowest in three years.
The job growth was the fastest since last March and April. Before that, the last month with stronger hiring, excluding months skewed by temporary census jobs, was March 2006.
The unemployment rate came down by two notches from December. It has fallen five months in a row, the first time that has happened since 1994, two economic booms and two recessions ago.
“The economy is growing stronger,” President Barack Obama said. “The recovery is speeding up.”
Indeed, the report Friday from the Labor Department seemed to reinforce that the nation is entering a virtuous cycle, a reinforcing loop in which stronger hiring leads to more consumer spending, which leads to even more hiring and spending.
On Wall Street, where investors had already driven stocks to their best start in 15 years because of optimism about the economy, the jobs report triggered a spasm of buying.
The Dow Jones industrial average climbed 156.82 points, its second-best showing this year, and finished the day at 12,862.23, its highest close since May 2008, four months before the financial crisis struck.
The Nasdaq composite index finished at its highest level since December 2000, during a steep decline after the dot-com stock craze. Money poured out of bonds, which are considered less risky than stocks, and bond yields rose.
“Virtually every economist on the planet had expected a drop in the rate of job gains in January, which makes today’s upward surprise even more surprising,” Dan Greenhaus, chief global strategist at the brokerage BTIG, said in a note to clients. In December, 203,000 jobs were created.
The impressive jobs report reverberated through the presidential campaign and could improve Obama’s re-election prospects. The drop in the unemployment rate put it exactly where it was in February 2009, the month after Obama took office.
In Arlington, Va., the president argued that now was no time to let a 2-percentage-point cut in the Social Security payroll tax expire, as it will if Congress doesn’t take action by the end of the month. The tax cut reaches 160 million Americans.
Of the economic recovery, he said: “We’ve got to do everything in our power to keep it going. We can’t go back to the policies that led to the recession, and we can’t let Washington stand in the way of the recovery.”
His Republican foes used the numbers to argue that the pace of improvement was not good enough.
“We can do better,” said former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the Republican front-runner. “These numbers cannot hide the fact that President Obama’s policies have prevented a true economic recovery.”
Unemployment was 6.8 percent when Obama was elected, 7.8 percent when he was sworn in and 10 percent, its recent peak, nine months later. No president since World War II has won re-election with unemployment higher than 7.2 percent.